Advertisement
ABT vs MDT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABT is a Hold and MDT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ABT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MDT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ABT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while MDT (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABT is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
MDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+4.93% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| ABT | MDT | ABT / MDT | |
| Capitalization | 217B | 127B | 171% |
| EBITDA | 11.8B | 9.43B | 125% |
| Gain YTD | -0.231 | 2.790 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.70 | 26.76 | 59% |
| Revenue | 43.8B | 34.8B | 126% |
| Total Cash | 7.73B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 12.9B | 29.1B | 44% |
ABT | MDT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDT's Valuation (7) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ABT (13). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ABT’s over the last 12 months.
ABT's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDT (98). This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDT’s over the last 12 months.
ABT's SMR Rating (31) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDT (72). This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDT’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ABT (58). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ABT’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABT (96). This means that MDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABT’s over the last 12 months.
| ABT | MDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 54% | 28 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 1 day ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NEMD | 52.63 | 0.11 | +0.20% |
| Neuberger Berman EM Debt Hard Ccy ETF | |||
| BINC | 53.03 | 0.06 | +0.11% |
| iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | |||
| IGR | 4.72 | N/A | N/A |
| CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | |||
| ITDH | 38.59 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF | |||
| ETHO | 67.87 | -0.26 | -0.38% |
| Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | |||
ABT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABT has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABT jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.
MDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDT has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDT jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.