ABT
Price
$126.54
Change
+$0.90 (+0.72%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
194.5B
81 days until earnings call
CDNA
Price
$12.79
Change
-$0.05 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
548.33M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABT vs CDNA

Header iconABT vs CDNA Comparison
Open Charts ABT vs CDNABanner chart's image
Abbott Laboratories
Price$126.54
Change+$0.90 (+0.72%)
Volume$4.74M
Capitalization194.5B
CareDx
Price$12.79
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
Volume$877.59K
Capitalization548.33M
ABT vs CDNA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABT vs. CDNA commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABT is a Buy and CDNA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ABT: $126.54 vs. CDNA: $12.79)
Brand notoriety: ABT: Notable vs. CDNA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABT: 70% vs. CDNA: 58%
Market capitalization -- ABT: $194.5B vs. CDNA: $548.33M
ABT [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $194.5B. CDNA’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $548.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CDNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABT is a better buy in the long-term than CDNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CDNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ABT and CDNA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ABT (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while CDNA (@Medical Specialties) price change was +7.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABT is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

CDNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABT($194B) has a higher market cap than CDNA($548M). ABT YTD gains are higher at: 13.489 vs. CDNA (-40.262). ABT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. CDNA (-84.92M). ABT has more cash in the bank: 7.28B vs. CDNA (235M). CDNA has less debt than ABT: CDNA (34.2M) vs ABT (15.6B). ABT has higher revenues than CDNA: ABT (40.1B) vs CDNA (280M).
ABTCDNAABT / CDNA
Capitalization194B548M35,401%
EBITDA10.5B-84.92M-12,365%
Gain YTD13.489-40.262-34%
P/E Ratio34.38N/A-
Revenue40.1B280M14,321%
Total Cash7.28B235M3,097%
Total Debt15.6B34.2M45,614%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABT vs CDNA: Fundamental Ratings
ABT
CDNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
116
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42100
SMR RATING
1..100
3246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6094
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9694
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABT's Valuation (11) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNA (96). This means that ABT’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

ABT's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNA (100). This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

ABT's SMR Rating (32) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CDNA (46). This means that ABT’s stock grew similarly to CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

ABT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNA (94). This means that ABT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

CDNA's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ABT (96). This means that CDNA’s stock grew similarly to ABT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABTCDNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIVRX12.990.08
+0.62%
MFS Intrinsic Value R6
FMIHX15.750.05
+0.32%
FMI Large Cap Investor
NMAVX12.430.04
+0.32%
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
FEUIX29.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec I
VTCAX88.08-0.52
-0.59%
Vanguard Communication Svcs Idx Admiral

ABT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABT has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABT jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABT
1D Price
Change %
ABT100%
+0.72%
SYK - ABT
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
MDT - ABT
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
STE - ABT
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
ALC - ABT
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
BAX - ABT
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More

CDNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNA has been loosely correlated with NTRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNA jumps, then NTRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNA
1D Price
Change %
CDNA100%
-0.39%
NTRA - CDNA
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
VCYT - CDNA
41%
Loosely correlated
+7.04%
BLFS - CDNA
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
LMAT - CDNA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
ABT - CDNA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More