Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABSZX vs SSGSX
ABSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ABSZX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
ABSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. ABSZX (2.43B). ABSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: ABSZX (0.85) vs SSGSX (0.58). ABSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ABSZX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ABSZX (0.81). ABSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs ABSZX (2000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. ABSZX (2.58). ABSZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.44 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| ABSZX | SSGSX | ABSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.23 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.23 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.497 | 8.123 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 5.04B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.58 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | 3.83 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.22 | -3.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.44 | -0.23 | -1,076% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.76 | 53.01 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement