ABSOF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.92M
CLSK
Price
$9.24
Change
+$0.16 (+1.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
102 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABSOF vs CLSK

Header iconABSOF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts ABSOF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
ABS-CBN Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102.5K
Capitalization5.92M
CleanSpark
Price$9.24
Change+$0.16 (+1.76%)
Volume$18.39M
Capitalization2.6B
ABSOF vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABSOF vs. CLSK commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABSOF is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ABSOF: $0.05 vs. CLSK: $9.24)
Brand notoriety: ABSOF and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABSOF: 94% vs. CLSK: 85%
Market capitalization -- ABSOF: $5.92M vs. CLSK: $2.6B
ABSOF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.92M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABSOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABSOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than ABSOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABSOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABSOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABSOF is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

ABSOF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.6B) has a higher market cap than ABSOF($5.92M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 0.326 vs. ABSOF (-54.545). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. ABSOF (-7.2K). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. ABSOF (11.7M). CLSK has higher revenues than ABSOF: CLSK (632M) vs ABSOF (5.42M).
ABSOFCLSKABSOF / CLSK
Capitalization5.92M2.6B0%
EBITDA-7.2K626M-0%
Gain YTD-54.5450.326-16,746%
P/E RatioN/A10.74-
Revenue5.42M632M1%
Total Cash11.7M916M1%
Total DebtN/A820M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABSOF vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
ABSOF
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
10052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABSOF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (71). This means that ABSOF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as ABSOF (92). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABSOF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABSOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABSOFCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKTX0.820.09
+12.15%
Akari Therapeutics plc
SG8.930.19
+2.17%
Sweetgreen
CL85.131.46
+1.74%
Colgate-Palmolive Company
MMS88.25-0.26
-0.29%
MAXIMUS
SGMT7.11-0.14
-1.93%
Sagimet Biosciences

ABSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABSOF and SNEX have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABSOF and SNEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABSOF
1D Price
Change %
ABSOF100%
N/A
SNEX - ABSOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
CLSK - ABSOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
HGBL - ABSOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
ASXFF - ABSOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - ABSOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+1.76%
COIN - CLSK
76%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
MARA - CLSK
69%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
RIOT - CLSK
67%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
BITF - CLSK
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
HIVE - CLSK
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More