Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABRVX vs NLSCX
ABRVX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ABRVX vs NLSCX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatil Instl
Price$10.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.34M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
ABRVX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABRVX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABRVX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. ABRVX (80.3M). ABRVX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: ABRVX (2.17) vs NLSCX (0.00). ABRVX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ABRVX (10 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ABRVX (2.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. ABRVX (0.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABRVX: NLSCX (1000) vs ABRVX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. ABRVX (-0.59). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.71 vs. ABRVX (-28.70).
| ABRVX | NLSCX | ABRVX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 2.43 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 2.43 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.211 | 5.822 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3M | 7.53B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.59 | 8.71 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.16 | 16.42 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.70 | 18.71 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.20 | 43.08 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement