ABRMF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.08 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
149.3M
MKNGF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.09 (+39.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABRMF vs MKNGF

Header iconABRMF vs MKNGF Comparison
Open Charts ABRMF vs MKNGFBanner chart's image
ARBOR METALS
Price$0.08
Change-$0.08 (-50.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization149.3M
MKANGO RES
Price$0.32
Change+$0.09 (+39.13%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization32.14M
ABRMF vs MKNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABRMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABRMF vs. MKNGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABRMF is a Hold and MKNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ABRMF: $0.08 vs. MKNGF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: ABRMF and MKNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABRMF: 42% vs. MKNGF: 63%
Market capitalization -- ABRMF: $149.3M vs. MKNGF: $32.14M
ABRMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $149.3M. MKNGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $32.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABRMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABRMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABRMF is a better buy in the long-term than MKNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABRMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKNGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABRMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MKNGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKNGF is a better buy in the short-term than ABRMF.

Price Growth

ABRMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -48.39% price change this week, while MKNGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +44.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABRMF($149M) has a higher market cap than MKNGF($32.1M). MKNGF YTD gains are higher at: 168.908 vs. ABRMF (122.222). ABRMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. MKNGF (-4.66M). MKNGF has more cash in the bank: 5.25M vs. ABRMF (9.53K). ABRMF has less debt than MKNGF: ABRMF (828K) vs MKNGF (1.83M). ABRMF (0) and MKNGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ABRMFMKNGFABRMF / MKNGF
Capitalization149M32.1M464%
EBITDA-1.22M-4.66M26%
Gain YTD122.222168.90872%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.53K5.25M0%
Total Debt828K1.83M45%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABRMFMKNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABRMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUERX35.110.27
+0.77%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R1
LAFFX19.920.13
+0.66%
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
MGFNX9.560.06
+0.63%
MassMutual Global R3
CUSCX11.240.03
+0.27%
Cullen Small Cap Value C
ARYCX25.300.05
+0.20%
American Century Real Estate C

ABRMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABRMF has been loosely correlated with JNDAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABRMF jumps, then JNDAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABRMF
1D Price
Change %
ABRMF100%
N/A
JNDAF - ABRMF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HANCF - ABRMF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARRRF - ABRMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-20.01%
ABCFF - ABRMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+32.14%
DAUGF - ABRMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MKNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKNGF and GRDAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKNGF and GRDAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKNGF
1D Price
Change %
MKNGF100%
+36.87%
GRDAF - MKNGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
GUELF - MKNGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARYMF - MKNGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UURAF - MKNGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
ABRMF - MKNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More