Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$13.09
Change-$0.16 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.4M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. ABPYX (87.4M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (1.97) vs ABPYX (1.39). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. ABPYX (4.38). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. ABPYX (11.38).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.295 | 15.095 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.4M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 9.09 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.80 | 43.82 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 41.33 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.29 | 77.46 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement