Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$12.79
Change+$0.16 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.87M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.75
Change+$0.57 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. ABPYX (82.9M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (2.13) vs ABPYX (1.51). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPYX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. ABPYX (4.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. ABPYX (5.96).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.29 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.29 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.234 | 3.196 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.9M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | 10.94 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 38.86 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.96 | 38.17 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.27 | 94.86 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement