Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPYX vs RLBFX
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPYX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
Price$12.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.33M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
ABPYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. ABPYX (84.3M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPYX: RLBFX (2.19) vs ABPYX (1.51). ABPYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPYX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). ABPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. ABPYX (7.87). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. ABPYX (8.21).
| ABPYX | RLBFX | ABPYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.29 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.702 | 2.344 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.3M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.19 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 14.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.31 | 39.01 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.21 | 38.38 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.71 | 92.91 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement