Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPCX vs RLBFX
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPCX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port C
Price$12.70
Change-$0.22 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.44M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.49
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
ABPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. ABPCX (83.4M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPCX: RLBFX (2.13) vs ABPCX (0.22). ABPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPCX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. ABPCX (4.33). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. ABPCX (0.67).
| ABPCX | RLBFX | ABPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.29 | 607% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.29 | 690% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.470 | 2.503 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 2.13 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 11.69 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.63 | 38.02 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.67 | 37.38 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.47 | 91.94 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement