Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPCX vs RLBCX
ABPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts ABPCX vs RLBCX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.52M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
ABPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. ABPCX (84.5M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than ABPCX: RLBCX (1.66) vs ABPCX (0.22). ABPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: ABPCX (22 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). ABPCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). ABPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPCX: RLBCX (250) vs ABPCX (2500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.26 vs. ABPCX (7.23). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. ABPCX (2.33).
| ABPCX | RLBCX | ABPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.89 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.89 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.784 | 2.499 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.5M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.66 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 14.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.69 | 36.66 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.33 | 34.46 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.12 | 85.65 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement