Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPAX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
Price$12.96
Change-$0.15 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.4M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. ABPAX (87.4M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs ABPAX (1.16). ABPAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. ABPAX (4.15). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. ABPAX (9.97).
| ABPAX | RLBFX | ABPAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.29 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.29 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.107 | 16.507 | 43% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.4M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | 10.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.86 | 44.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.97 | 43.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.64 | 81.39 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement