ABMRF
Price
$33.84
Change
-$1.67 (-4.70%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Capitalization
28.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BACHY
Price
$14.33
Change
+$0.13 (+0.92%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
238.05B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABMRF vs BACHY

Header iconABMRF vs BACHY Comparison
Open Charts ABMRF vs BACHYBanner chart's image
ABN Amro Group
Price$33.84
Change-$1.67 (-4.70%)
Volume$127
Capitalization28.57B
Bank of China
Price$14.33
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
Volume$26.51K
Capitalization238.05B
ABMRF vs BACHY Comparison Chart in %
ABMRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BACHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABMRF vs. BACHY commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABMRF is a Hold and BACHY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ABMRF: $33.84 vs. BACHY: $14.33)
Brand notoriety: ABMRF and BACHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABMRF: 17% vs. BACHY: 55%
Market capitalization -- ABMRF: $28.57B vs. BACHY: $238.05B
ABMRF [@Major Banks] is valued at $28.57B. BACHY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $238.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $892.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABMRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBACHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABMRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BACHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABMRF is a better buy in the long-term than BACHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABMRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABMRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BACHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHY is a better buy in the short-term than ABMRF.

Price Growth

ABMRF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BACHY (@Major Banks) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.32% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHY($238B) has a higher market cap than ABMRF($28.6B). ABMRF has higher P/E ratio than BACHY: ABMRF (11.25) vs BACHY (5.37). ABMRF YTD gains are higher at: 111.494 vs. BACHY (21.123). ABMRF has less debt than BACHY: ABMRF (84.7B) vs BACHY (2.85T). BACHY has higher revenues than ABMRF: BACHY (642B) vs ABMRF (8.66B).
ABMRFBACHYABMRF / BACHY
Capitalization28.6B238B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD111.49421.123528%
P/E Ratio11.255.37209%
Revenue8.66B642B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt84.7B2.85T3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABMRF vs BACHY: Fundamental Ratings
ABMRF
BACHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9513
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
106
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
841
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABMRF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BACHY (90). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (10). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMRF (6). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ABMRF’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (57). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ABMRF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BACHY (41). This means that ABMRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMRFBACHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABMRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BACHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THQ19.280.05
+0.26%
abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
XLV156.050.25
+0.16%
State Street®HlthCrSelSectSPDR®ETF
RZB24.910.02
+0.08%
Reinsurance Group of America
PNI6.88N/A
N/A
PIMCO NEW YORK Municipal Income FUND II
BBSB99.38N/A
N/A
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd1-3YrETF

ABMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMRF and JPM have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMRF and JPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMRF
1D Price
Change %
ABMRF100%
N/A
JPM - ABMRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ACGBF - ABMRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
ACGBY - ABMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
BACHF - ABMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
More

BACHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHY
1D Price
Change %
BACHY100%
+0.90%
CICHY - BACHY
82%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
IDCBY - BACHY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
ACGBY - BACHY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
BACHF - BACHY
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
SCBFY - BACHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More