ABM
Price
$48.13
Change
-$0.60 (-1.23%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.03B
One day until earnings call
GHC
Price
$1129.16
Change
+$28.82 (+2.62%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.8B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABM vs GHC

Header iconABM vs GHC Comparison
Open Charts ABM vs GHCBanner chart's image
ABM Industries
Price$48.13
Change-$0.60 (-1.23%)
Volume$12.15K
Capitalization3.03B
Graham Holdings
Price$1129.16
Change+$28.82 (+2.62%)
Volume$101
Capitalization4.8B
ABM vs GHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABM vs. GHC commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABM is a Hold and GHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ABM: $48.72 vs. GHC: $1100.34)
Brand notoriety: ABM and GHC are both not notable
ABM represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while GHC is part of the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABM: 112% vs. GHC: 72%
Market capitalization -- ABM: $3.03B vs. GHC: $4.8B
ABM [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $3.03B. GHC’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ABM and GHC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABM is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

ABM (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABM is expected to report earnings on Sep 05, 2025.

GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.61% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Other Consumer Specialties (-1.24% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($4.8B) has a higher market cap than ABM($3.03B). ABM has higher P/E ratio than GHC: ABM (38.98) vs GHC (7.14). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 26.947 vs. ABM (-3.262). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. ABM (328M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. ABM (58.7M). GHC has less debt than ABM: GHC (1.25B) vs ABM (1.67B). ABM has higher revenues than GHC: ABM (8.5B) vs GHC (4.84B).
ABMGHCABM / GHC
Capitalization3.03B4.8B63%
EBITDA328M1.36B24%
Gain YTD-3.26226.947-12%
P/E Ratio38.987.14546%
Revenue8.5B4.84B176%
Total Cash58.7M1.07B5%
Total Debt1.67B1.25B133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABM vs GHC: Fundamental Ratings
ABM
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
473
SMR RATING
1..100
9452
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABM's Valuation (30) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABM (47) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABM (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ABM (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.

ABM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (98) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMGHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGRCX55.430.35
+0.64%
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
MLVRX19.950.04
+0.20%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R4
FZAHX229.80N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps Z
FAQIX15.41-0.01
-0.06%
Nuveen Dividend Value I
RSGFX12.13-0.01
-0.08%
Victory RS Select Growth C

ABM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABM has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABM jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABM
1D Price
Change %
ABM100%
-0.06%
MSA - ABM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
AZZ - ABM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
BCO - ABM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
BRC - ABM
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
GHC - ABM
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+1.05%
MSA - GHC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
LOPE - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
CASS - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
AZZ - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
ATGE - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More