ABM
Price
$55.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
32 days until earnings call
GHC
Price
$937.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ABM vs GHC

Header iconABM vs GHC Comparison
Open Charts ABM vs GHCBanner chart's image
ABM Industries
Price$55.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$178.09K
CapitalizationN/A
Graham Holdings
Price$937.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.31K
CapitalizationN/A
ABM vs GHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABM vs. GHC commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABM is a Buy and GHC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (ABM: $55.58 vs. GHC: $937.11)
Brand notoriety: ABM and GHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABM: 34% vs. GHC: 102%
Market capitalization -- ABM: $2.82B vs. GHC: $3.42B
ABM [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.82B. GHC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABM is a better buy in the long-term than GHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABM is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

ABM (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABM is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

GHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.54% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than ABM($2.82B). GHC has higher P/E ratio than ABM: GHC (17.25) vs ABM (11.41). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 35.767 vs. ABM (26.354). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. ABM (533M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. ABM (58M). GHC has less debt than ABM: GHC (1.25B) vs ABM (1.46B). ABM has higher revenues than GHC: ABM (8.18B) vs GHC (4.42B).
ABMGHCABM / GHC
Capitalization2.82B3.42B83%
EBITDA533M665M80%
Gain YTD26.35435.76774%
P/E Ratio11.4117.2566%
Revenue8.18B4.42B185%
Total Cash58M867M7%
Total Debt1.46B1.25B116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABM vs GHC: Fundamental Ratings
ABM
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1061
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2837
SMR RATING
1..100
9081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABM's Valuation (25) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

ABM's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ABM (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ABM (44) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.

ABM's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABMGHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ABM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABM has been loosely correlated with MMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABM jumps, then MMS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABM
1D Price
Change %
ABM100%
-2.35%
MMS - ABM
41%
Loosely correlated
-7.82%
GHC - ABM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
BCO - ABM
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
CTAS - ABM
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
UNF - ABM
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
More

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with UNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then UNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
-0.73%
UNF - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
RGP - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
BCO - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
BV - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-13.37%
CASS - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More