ABL
Price
$5.32
Change
+$0.10 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
775.8M
UNM
Price
$80.48
Change
+$0.71 (+0.89%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.32B
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABL vs UNM

Header iconABL vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts ABL vs UNMBanner chart's image
Abacus Global Management
Price$5.32
Change+$0.10 (+1.92%)
Volume$497.99K
Capitalization775.8M
Unum Group
Price$80.48
Change+$0.71 (+0.89%)
Volume$941.88K
Capitalization10.32B
ABL vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABL vs. UNM commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Buy and UNM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ABL: $5.32 vs. UNM: $80.48)
Brand notoriety: ABL and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABL: 41% vs. UNM: 84%
Market capitalization -- ABL: $775.8M vs. UNM: $10.32B
ABL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $775.8M. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $10.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than ABL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABL is a better buy in the short-term than UNM.

Price Growth

ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +9.47% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

UNM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.56% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNM($10.3B) has a higher market cap than ABL($776M). ABL has higher P/E ratio than UNM: ABL (76.28) vs UNM (8.29). UNM YTD gains are higher at: 11.407 vs. ABL (-32.056). UNM has more cash in the bank: 38.6B vs. ABL (27.8M). ABL has less debt than UNM: ABL (142M) vs UNM (3.43B). UNM has higher revenues than ABL: UNM (12.3B) vs ABL (66.4M).
ABLUNMABL / UNM
Capitalization776M10.3B8%
EBITDA23.8MN/A-
Gain YTD-32.05611.407-281%
P/E Ratio76.288.29920%
Revenue66.4M12.3B1%
Total Cash27.8M38.6B0%
Total Debt142M3.43B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNM: Fundamental Ratings
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABLUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPHD39.000.57
+1.48%
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF
GOOP27.330.17
+0.63%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Google ETF
ASMF22.800.10
+0.42%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
CGSD25.960.01
+0.04%
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
INDL60.38-0.38
-0.63%
Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF

ABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and ABLLL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and ABLLL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABL
1D Price
Change %
ABL100%
+1.92%
ABLLL - ABL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
GNW - ABL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
UNM - ABL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
GL - ABL
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
PUK - ABL
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+0.89%
MET - UNM
81%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
PRI - UNM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
CNO - UNM
75%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
PRU - UNM
74%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
LNC - UNM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More