ABL
Price
$4.64
Change
-$0.80 (-14.71%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
775.8M
UNM
Price
$80.46
Change
+$0.76 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.32B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABL vs UNM

Header iconABL vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts ABL vs UNMBanner chart's image
Abacus Global Management
Price$4.64
Change-$0.80 (-14.71%)
Volume$2.65M
Capitalization775.8M
Unum Group
Price$80.46
Change+$0.76 (+0.95%)
Volume$1.76M
Capitalization10.32B
ABL vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABL vs. UNM commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Hold and UNM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ABL: $4.64 vs. UNM: $80.46)
Brand notoriety: ABL and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABL: 257% vs. UNM: 151%
Market capitalization -- ABL: $775.8M vs. UNM: $10.32B
ABL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $775.8M. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $10.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than ABL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the short-term than ABL.

Price Growth

ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -15.48% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

UNM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+2.13% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNM($10.3B) has a higher market cap than ABL($776M). ABL has higher P/E ratio than UNM: ABL (76.28) vs UNM (8.29). UNM YTD gains are higher at: 11.379 vs. ABL (-40.741). UNM has more cash in the bank: 38.6B vs. ABL (27.8M). ABL has less debt than UNM: ABL (142M) vs UNM (3.43B). UNM has higher revenues than ABL: UNM (12.3B) vs ABL (66.4M).
ABLUNMABL / UNM
Capitalization776M10.3B8%
EBITDA23.8MN/A-
Gain YTD-40.74111.379-358%
P/E Ratio76.288.29920%
Revenue66.4M12.3B1%
Total Cash27.8M38.6B0%
Total Debt142M3.43B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNM: Fundamental Ratings
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABLUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTAN28.890.44
+1.53%
Sparkline International IntangibleValETF
RFI11.980.14
+1.18%
Cohen and Steers Total Return Realty Fund
UNOV36.000.12
+0.32%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
CGRO26.24-0.14
-0.54%
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF
RING42.50-1.74
-3.93%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

ABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and GNW have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and GNW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABL
1D Price
Change %
ABL100%
-14.71%
GNW - ABL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
ABLLL - ABL
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
UNM - ABL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
GL - ABL
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
PUK - ABL
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+0.95%
MET - UNM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
PRI - UNM
79%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
PRU - UNM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
CNO - UNM
75%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
LNC - UNM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More