Advertisement
ABL vs SZZLU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a StrongBuy and SZZLU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZLU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ABL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SZZLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZZLU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SZZLU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +27.36% price change this week, while SZZLU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.99%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+0.81% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.48% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| ABL | SZZLU | ABL / SZZLU | |
| Capitalization | 660M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 50.5M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.793 | N/A | - |
| P/E Ratio | 135.10 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 162M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 74.8M | 1.12M | 6,703% |
| Total Debt | 362M | 262K | 138,168% |
| ABL | SZZLU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 16% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 23% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 12% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | about 1 month ago 8% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
Advertisement
ABL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and ABLLL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and ABLLL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABL | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| ABLLL - ABL | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SOC - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -11.48% | ||
| TRON - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -13.10% | ||
| PRU - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| GNW - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
SZZLU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SZZLU and HYAC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZZLU and HYAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SZZLU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZZLU | 100% | N/A | ||
| HYAC - SZZLU | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VMCUF - SZZLU | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASCBF - SZZLU | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ABL - SZZLU | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SOC - SZZLU | 20% Poorly correlated | -11.48% | ||
More | ||||