ABL
Price
$5.39
Change
+$0.06 (+1.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
775.8M
PUK
Price
$24.88
Change
+$0.13 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABL vs PUK

Header iconABL vs PUK Comparison
Open Charts ABL vs PUKBanner chart's image
Abacus Global Management
Price$5.39
Change+$0.06 (+1.13%)
Volume$503.38K
Capitalization775.8M
Prudential
Price$24.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
Volume$626.56K
Capitalization25.79B
ABL vs PUK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABL vs. PUK commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Hold and PUK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ABL: $5.39 vs. PUK: $24.88)
Brand notoriety: ABL and PUK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABL: 47% vs. PUK: 73%
Market capitalization -- ABL: $775.8M vs. PUK: $25.79B
ABL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $775.8M. PUK’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $25.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PUK is a better buy in the long-term than ABL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PUK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABL is a better buy in the short-term than PUK.

Price Growth

ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while PUK (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUK($25.8B) has a higher market cap than ABL($776M). ABL has higher P/E ratio than PUK: ABL (76.28) vs PUK (15.34). PUK YTD gains are higher at: 58.440 vs. ABL (-31.162). ABL has less debt than PUK: ABL (142M) vs PUK (4.87B). PUK has higher revenues than ABL: PUK (12B) vs ABL (66.4M).
ABLPUKABL / PUK
Capitalization776M25.8B3%
EBITDA23.8MN/A-
Gain YTD-31.16258.440-53%
P/E Ratio76.2815.34497%
Revenue66.4M12B1%
Total Cash27.8MN/A-
Total Debt142M4.87B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUK: Fundamental Ratings
PUK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABLPUK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGLUX44.430.65
+1.48%
Baron Global Advantage R6
PFSQX26.230.32
+1.24%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services R6
MRGJX54.580.49
+0.91%
MFS Core Equity R4
GMNPX39.060.04
+0.10%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras P
HNRIX29.03-0.05
-0.17%
Hennessy Energy Transition Instl

ABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and ABLLL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and ABLLL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABL
1D Price
Change %
ABL100%
+1.13%
ABLLL - ABL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
GNW - ABL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
UNM - ABL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
GL - ABL
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
PUK - ABL
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More

PUK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUK has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUK jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUK
1D Price
Change %
PUK100%
+0.53%
MFC - PUK
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
AAGIY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
PNGAY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
PRU - PUK
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
LNC - PUK
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More