ABL
Price
$6.06
Change
+$0.22 (+3.77%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
775.8M
GNW
Price
$6.95
Change
-$0.11 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.85B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABL vs GNW

Header iconABL vs GNW Comparison
Open Charts ABL vs GNWBanner chart's image
Abacus Global Management
Price$6.06
Change+$0.22 (+3.77%)
Volume$2.14M
Capitalization775.8M
Genworth Financial
Price$6.95
Change-$0.11 (-1.56%)
Volume$6.07M
Capitalization2.85B
ABL vs GNW Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABL vs. GNW commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Hold and GNW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (ABL: $6.06 vs. GNW: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: ABL: Not notable vs. GNW: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABL: 236% vs. GNW: 84%
Market capitalization -- ABL: $775.8M vs. GNW: $2.85B
ABL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $775.8M. GNW’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $2.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the long-term than ABL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the short-term than ABL.

Price Growth

ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while GNW (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

GNW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.92% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNW($2.85B) has a higher market cap than ABL($776M). ABL has higher P/E ratio than GNW: ABL (76.28) vs GNW (39.63). GNW YTD gains are higher at: -0.572 vs. ABL (-22.605). GNW has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. ABL (27.8M). ABL has less debt than GNW: ABL (142M) vs GNW (1.58B). GNW has higher revenues than ABL: GNW (7.37B) vs ABL (66.4M).
ABLGNWABL / GNW
Capitalization776M2.85B27%
EBITDA23.8MN/A-
Gain YTD-22.605-0.5723,950%
P/E Ratio76.2839.63193%
Revenue66.4M7.37B1%
Total Cash27.8M49B0%
Total Debt142M1.58B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNW: Fundamental Ratings
GNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABLGNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCPI47.65N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
RLTY15.02-0.08
-0.53%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund
PHEQ29.96-0.24
-0.81%
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
AIQ41.60-0.59
-1.40%
Global X Artfcl Intlgc & Tech ETF
LFGY38.57-0.69
-1.76%
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

ABL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and GNW have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and GNW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABL
1D Price
Change %
ABL100%
+3.77%
GNW - ABL
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
GL - ABL
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
TDHOY - ABL
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
PUK - ABL
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
FG - ABL
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
More

GNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNW has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNW jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNW
1D Price
Change %
GNW100%
-1.56%
PRI - GNW
76%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
PRU - GNW
75%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
MET - GNW
75%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
LNC - GNW
71%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
GL - GNW
70%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More