Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABIZX vs JVMCX
ABIZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts ABIZX vs JVMCX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Z
Price$23.25
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets344.16M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
ABIZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABIZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABIZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. ABIZX (344M). ABIZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: ABIZX (0.56) vs JVMCX (0.00). ABIZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: ABIZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ABIZX (0.79). ABIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABIZX: JVMCX (1000) vs ABIZX (5000000). ABIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.65 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. ABIZX (-26.18).
| ABIZX | JVMCX | ABIZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.86 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.602 | 8.893 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 23.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.65 | -6.45 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.00 | 21.60 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.18 | 40.87 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers