Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABIAX vs TRIGX
ABIAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts ABIAX vs TRIGX
AB International Value A
Price$18.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.67M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
ABIAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABIAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABIAX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. ABIAX (125M). ABIAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: ABIAX (7.24) vs TRIGX (1.91). ABIAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: ABIAX (25 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). ABIAX (1.75) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). ABIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). ABIAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ABIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.09 vs. TRIGX (27.26). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. ABIAX (90.52).
| ABIAX | TRIGX | ABIAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.87 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.87 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.105 | 34.432 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 16.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.24 | 1.91 | 379% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.09 | 27.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.18 | 99.99 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.52 | 108.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.09 | 100.18 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement