ABG
Price
$229.96
Change
+$0.44 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
9 days until earnings call
MUSA
Price
$420.99
Change
-$0.55 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.88B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABG vs MUSA

Header iconABG vs MUSA Comparison
Open Charts ABG vs MUSABanner chart's image
Asbury Automotive Group
Price$229.96
Change+$0.44 (+0.19%)
Volume$175.24K
Capitalization4.78B
Murphy USA
Price$420.99
Change-$0.55 (-0.13%)
Volume$194.18K
Capitalization8.88B
ABG vs MUSA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABG vs. MUSA commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABG is a Hold and MUSA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (ABG: $229.96 vs. MUSA: $420.99)
Brand notoriety: ABG and MUSA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABG: 122% vs. MUSA: 61%
Market capitalization -- ABG: $4.78B vs. MUSA: $8.88B
ABG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.78B. MUSA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUSA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABG is a better buy in the long-term than MUSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MUSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUSA is a better buy in the short-term than ABG.

Price Growth

ABG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -12.64% price change this week, while MUSA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

MUSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUSA($8.88B) has a higher market cap than ABG($4.78B). MUSA has higher P/E ratio than ABG: MUSA (16.75) vs ABG (8.15). ABG YTD gains are higher at: -5.378 vs. MUSA (-15.910). MUSA (1.06B) and ABG (1.04B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . MUSA has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. ABG (51.9M). MUSA has less debt than ABG: MUSA (2.27B) vs ABG (5.48B). MUSA has higher revenues than ABG: MUSA (21.5B) vs ABG (14.8B).
ABGMUSAABG / MUSA
Capitalization4.78B8.88B54%
EBITDA1.04B1.06B97%
Gain YTD-5.378-15.91034%
P/E Ratio8.1516.7549%
Revenue14.8B21.5B69%
Total Cash51.9M125M42%
Total Debt5.48B2.27B241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABG vs MUSA: Fundamental Ratings
ABG
MUSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2521
SMR RATING
1..100
6217
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABG's Valuation (66) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (80). This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as ABG (25). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to ABG’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's SMR Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABG (62). This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABG’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (63). This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUSA (71). This means that ABG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABGMUSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INPSX39.290.15
+0.38%
ProFunds Internet UltraSector Svc
JLGMX90.260.02
+0.02%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R6
DIEQX38.56-0.04
-0.10%
Domini Impact Equity Institutional
IHOIX21.08-0.13
-0.61%
Hartford International Opportunities I
MAGKX13.68-0.12
-0.87%
MoA Small Cap Growth Fund

ABG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ABG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABG
1D Price
Change %
ABG100%
+0.19%
AN - ABG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
GPI - ABG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
PAG - ABG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
LAD - ABG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
SAH - ABG
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More

MUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSA
1D Price
Change %
MUSA100%
-0.13%
CASY - MUSA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ORLY - MUSA
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
TSCO - MUSA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ABG - MUSA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
SAH - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More