ABG
Price
$232.07
Change
+$2.04 (+0.89%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
51 days until earnings call
MUSA
Price
$425.24
Change
+$5.26 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.88B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABG vs MUSA

Header iconABG vs MUSA Comparison
Open Charts ABG vs MUSABanner chart's image
Asbury Automotive Group
Price$232.07
Change+$2.04 (+0.89%)
Volume$76K
Capitalization4.78B
Murphy USA
Price$425.24
Change+$5.26 (+1.25%)
Volume$198.42K
Capitalization8.88B
ABG vs MUSA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABG vs. MUSA commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABG is a Buy and MUSA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ABG: $228.60 vs. MUSA: $430.40)
Brand notoriety: ABG and MUSA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABG: 51% vs. MUSA: 93%
Market capitalization -- ABG: $4.78B vs. MUSA: $8.88B
ABG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.78B. MUSA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUSA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABG is a better buy in the long-term than MUSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MUSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ABG and MUSA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ABG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while MUSA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

MUSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUSA($8.88B) has a higher market cap than ABG($4.78B). MUSA has higher P/E ratio than ABG: MUSA (16.75) vs ABG (8.15). ABG YTD gains are higher at: -5.938 vs. MUSA (-14.030). MUSA (1.06B) and ABG (1.04B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . MUSA has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. ABG (51.9M). MUSA has less debt than ABG: MUSA (2.27B) vs ABG (5.48B). MUSA has higher revenues than ABG: MUSA (21.5B) vs ABG (14.8B).
ABGMUSAABG / MUSA
Capitalization4.78B8.88B54%
EBITDA1.04B1.06B97%
Gain YTD-5.938-14.03042%
P/E Ratio8.1516.7549%
Revenue14.8B21.5B69%
Total Cash51.9M125M42%
Total Debt5.48B2.27B241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABG vs MUSA: Fundamental Ratings
ABG
MUSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2310
SMR RATING
1..100
6017
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2255
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ABG's Valuation (65) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (79). This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as ABG (23). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to ABG’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's SMR Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABG (60). This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABG’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (79). This means that ABG’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

ABG's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUSA (55). This means that ABG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABGMUSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

ABG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ABG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABG
1D Price
Change %
ABG100%
-0.48%
AN - ABG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
LAD - ABG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
GPI - ABG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
PAG - ABG
72%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
SAH - ABG
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More

MUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSA
1D Price
Change %
MUSA100%
-0.33%
CASY - MUSA
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.00%
ORLY - MUSA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
ABG - MUSA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
SAH - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
TSCO - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
More