Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABFAX vs RLBAX
ABFAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABFAX vs RLBAX
American Beacon Balanced A
Price$12.06
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.83M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
ABFAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABFAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABFAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. ABFAX (107M). ABFAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ABFAX (2.06) vs RLBAX (1.18). ABFAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ABFAX (15 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than ABFAX (1.18). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ABFAX (38.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABFAX: RLBAX (250) vs ABFAX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. ABFAX (-0.11). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. ABFAX (6.18).
| ABFAX | RLBAX | ABFAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.31 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.31 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.751 | 8.565 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.18 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.11 | 9.42 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 32.14 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.18 | 35.28 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.95 | 58.06 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement