Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABFAX vs RLBAX
ABFAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABFAX vs RLBAX
American Beacon Balanced A
Price$12.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.42M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
ABFAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABFAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABFAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. ABFAX (106M). ABFAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ABFAX (2.06) vs RLBAX (1.17). ABFAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ABFAX (15 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than ABFAX (1.18). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ABFAX (38.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABFAX: RLBAX (250) vs ABFAX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. ABFAX (-1.78). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. ABFAX (3.62).
| ABFAX | RLBAX | ABFAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.31 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.31 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.663 | 9.243 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.17 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 7.15 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.79 | 27.06 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.62 | 33.77 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.98 | 59.12 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement