Advertisement
ABEV vs SAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABEV is a Buy and SAM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABEV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ABEV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABEV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABEV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ABEV (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while SAM (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABEV is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
SAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.88% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| ABEV | SAM | ABEV / SAM | |
| Capitalization | 36.5B | 2.34B | 1,563% |
| EBITDA | 29.4B | 275M | 10,691% |
| Gain YTD | 28.582 | -28.482 | -100% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.99 | 29.66 | 44% |
| Revenue | 91.7B | 2.05B | 4,473% |
| Total Cash | 17.5B | 212M | 8,255% |
| Total Debt | 3.16B | 43.9M | 7,194% |
ABEV | SAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABEV's Valuation (3) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAM (84). This means that ABEV’s stock grew significantly faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (100). This means that ABEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's SMR Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (77). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (60). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (66). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
| ABEV | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
ABEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABEV has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABEV jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABEV | 100% | N/A | ||
| BUD - ABEV | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| FMX - ABEV | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CCU - ABEV | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| DEO - ABEV | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| STZ - ABEV | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
SAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAM has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAM jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.