Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABEMX vs RNWBX
ABEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ABEMX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl
Price$18.53
Change+$1.07 (+6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.51M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ABEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ABEMX (971M). ABEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ABEMX (0.80) vs RNWBX (0.45). ABEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ABEMX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than ABEMX (1.22). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. ABEMX (35.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ABEMX (1000000). ABEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.65 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. ABEMX (-11.30).
| ABEMX | RNWBX | ABEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.970 | 5.996 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.45 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.65 | 26.27 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.16 | 38.81 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.30 | 7.03 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.43 | 114.19 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement