ABCP
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.95M
AGPYF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.03 (+23.08%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Capitalization
831.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABCP vs AGPYF

Header iconABCP vs AGPYF Comparison
Open Charts ABCP vs AGPYFBanner chart's image
AmBase
Price$0.32
Change+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Volume$1.85K
Capitalization4.95M
Agile Group Holdings
Price$0.16
Change+$0.03 (+23.08%)
Volume$6.4K
Capitalization831.84M
ABCP vs AGPYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABCP vs. AGPYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCP is a Hold and AGPYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ABCP: $0.32 vs. AGPYF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: ABCP and AGPYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABCP: 9% vs. AGPYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ABCP: $4.95M vs. AGPYF: $831.84M
ABCP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.95M. AGPYF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $831.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAGPYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ABCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AGPYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGPYF is a better buy in the long-term than ABCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ABCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ABCP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while AGPYF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGPYF($832M) has a higher market cap than ABCP($4.95M). ABCP (0.000) and AGPYF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . AGPYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.4B vs. ABCP (-3.55M). AGPYF has more cash in the bank: 18.4B vs. ABCP (44K). ABCP has less debt than AGPYF: ABCP (300K) vs AGPYF (70.6B). AGPYF has higher revenues than ABCP: AGPYF (66.1B) vs ABCP (0).
ABCPAGPYFABCP / AGPYF
Capitalization4.95M832M1%
EBITDA-3.55M12.4B-0%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A2.31-
Revenue066.1B-
Total Cash44K18.4B0%
Total Debt300K70.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABCP vs AGPYF: Fundamental Ratings
ABCP
AGPYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
10076
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGPYF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABCP (93). This means that AGPYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABCP’s over the last 12 months.

ABCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AGPYF (100). This means that ABCP’s stock grew similarly to AGPYF’s over the last 12 months.

AGPYF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCP (100). This means that AGPYF’s stock grew similarly to ABCP’s over the last 12 months.

AGPYF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCP (51). This means that AGPYF’s stock grew similarly to ABCP’s over the last 12 months.

ABCP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AGPYF (16). This means that ABCP’s stock grew similarly to AGPYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABCPAGPYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LX7.330.35
+5.01%
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd
PCRX23.220.01
+0.04%
Pacira BioSciences
AMAT190.01N/A
N/A
Applied Materials
THO92.60-1.20
-1.28%
Thor Industries
LODE3.75-0.06
-1.57%
Comstock Inc.

ABCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABCP and SIUDF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABCP and SIUDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABCP
1D Price
Change %
ABCP100%
N/A
SIUDF - ABCP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGPYF - ABCP
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AANNF - ABCP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEKE - ABCP
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
FTHM - ABCP
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
More

AGPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGPYF has been loosely correlated with MRCBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGPYF jumps, then MRCBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGPYF
1D Price
Change %
AGPYF100%
N/A
MRCBF - AGPYF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LRHC - AGPYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+87.27%
FHRT - AGPYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABCP - AGPYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMLLF - AGPYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More