It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABBV’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGSK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABBV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABBV (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while GSK (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.16%.
ABBV is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
GSK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
ABBV | GSK | ABBV / GSK | |
Capitalization | 406B | 88.1B | 461% |
EBITDA | 14.2B | 8.61B | 165% |
Gain YTD | 33.707 | 34.239 | 98% |
P/E Ratio | 109.32 | 19.81 | 552% |
Revenue | 58.3B | 31.6B | 184% |
Total Cash | N/A | 3.62B | - |
Total Debt | 70.5B | 17.4B | 405% |
ABBV | GSK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSK's Valuation (8) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABBV (89). This means that GSK’s stock grew significantly faster than ABBV’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSK (49). This means that ABBV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's SMR Rating (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (40). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (44). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (14). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV | GSK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago32% | 2 days ago41% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 5 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago42% | 3 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago43% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago46% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NAIL | 64.90 | 1.26 | +1.98% |
Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF | |||
MAYU | 30.87 | 0.14 | +0.45% |
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Unc May ETF | |||
DFAT | 56.82 | 0.20 | +0.35% |
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | |||
TJUL | 29.37 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
Innovator Eq Defnd Protd ETF2 Yr-Jul2027 | |||
SAA | 24.98 | -0.06 | -0.24% |
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABBV has been loosely correlated with AMGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABBV jumps, then AMGN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABBV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV | 100% | +1.19% | ||
AMGN - ABBV | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
PFE - ABBV | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
BIIB - ABBV | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
NVS - ABBV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
AZN - ABBV | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSK has been closely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSK jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.