It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABBV’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileALPMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABBV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALPMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABBV (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -3.19% price change this week, while ALPMF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.
ABBV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| ABBV | ALPMF | ABBV / ALPMF | |
| Capitalization | 407B | 22.8B | 1,785% |
| EBITDA | 14.2B | 270B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 30.696 | 23.986 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 174.42 | 27.41 | 636% |
| Revenue | 58.3B | 1.77T | 3% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 329B | - |
| Total Debt | 70.5B | 927B | 8% |
ABBV | ALPMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALPMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABBV (89) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that ALPMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABBV’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALPMF (100) in the null industry. This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's SMR Rating (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALPMF (100) in the null industry. This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ALPMF (43) in the null industry. This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALPMF (93) in the null industry. This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
| ABBV | ALPMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 46% | 7 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 39% | 7 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% | 7 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 43% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 49% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DUSL | 71.69 | 2.04 | +2.93% |
| Direxion Dly Industrials Bull 3X ShsETF | |||
| VGSH | 58.72 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | |||
| BIT | 13.20 | N/A | N/A |
| BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR Income TRUST | |||
| BCLO | 49.67 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | |||
| PNI | 6.90 | -0.01 | -0.14% |
| PIMCO NEW YORK Municipal Income FUND II | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABBV has been loosely correlated with PFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABBV jumps, then PFE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABBV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| PFE - ABBV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| BMY - ABBV | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| AMGN - ABBV | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| NVS - ABBV | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| BIIB - ABBV | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALPMF has been loosely correlated with ALPMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALPMF jumps, then ALPMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALPMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALPMY - ALPMF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JNJ - ALPMF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRFS - ALPMF | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.13% | ||
| AZNCF - ALPMF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ABBV - ALPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||