ABBB
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.62M
CGMBF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.05 (+12.20%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABBB vs CGMBF

Header iconABBB vs CGMBF Comparison
Open Charts ABBB vs CGMBFBanner chart's image
Auburn Ban
Price$9.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.62M
China Minsheng Banking
Price$0.46
Change+$0.05 (+12.20%)
Volume$17.5K
Capitalization23.21B
ABBB vs CGMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABBB vs. CGMBF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABBB is a Hold and CGMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ABBB: $9.00 vs. CGMBF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: ABBB and CGMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABBB: 100% vs. CGMBF: 6%
Market capitalization -- ABBB: $3.62M vs. CGMBF: $23.21B
ABBB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.62M. CGMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABBB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGMBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ABBB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGMBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGMBF is a better buy in the long-term than ABBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGMBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CGMBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABBB is a better buy in the short-term than CGMBF.

Price Growth

ABBB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CGMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMBF($23.2B) has a higher market cap than ABBB($3.62M). CGMBF YTD gains are higher at: 11.961 vs. ABBB (0.000). ABBB has less debt than CGMBF: ABBB (17.8M) vs CGMBF (668B). CGMBF has higher revenues than ABBB: CGMBF (143B) vs ABBB (2.96M).
ABBBCGMBFABBB / CGMBF
Capitalization3.62M23.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00011.961-
P/E RatioN/A3.90-
Revenue2.96M143B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17.8M668B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABBB vs CGMBF: Fundamental Ratings
ABBB
CGMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGMBF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABBB (77). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABBB’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABBB (100). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to ABBB’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABBB (89). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABBB’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ABBB (58). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to ABBB’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABBB (100). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than ABBB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABBBCGMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDNS326.8115.86
+5.10%
Cadence Design Systems
KULR6.790.22
+3.35%
KULR Technology Group Inc
AREN6.200.16
+2.65%
Arena Group Holdings (The)
PUBM12.820.15
+1.18%
PubMatic
TLX16.07-0.43
-2.61%
Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

ABBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABBB and SUGBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABBB and SUGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABBB
1D Price
Change %
ABBB100%
N/A
SUGBY - ABBB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - ABBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBKM - ABBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNBK - ABBB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBY - ABBB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMBF and ABBB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMBF and ABBB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMBF
1D Price
Change %
CGMBF100%
N/A
ABBB - CGMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHCJY - CGMBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CGMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
CHBH - CGMBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CFIC - CGMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More