Advertisement
ABAT vs GLCNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABAT is a Hold and GLCNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLCNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- GLCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLCNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GLCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GLCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLCNF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| ABAT | GLCNF | ABAT / GLCNF | |
| Capitalization | 90.8M | 75.4B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -26.96M | 31.6B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -25.610 | -2.637 | 971% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 4.56 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 256B | - |
| Total Cash | 7.73M | 1.45B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 16.4M | 28.8B | 0% |
ABAT | GLCNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABAT's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (94). This means that ABAT’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.
GLCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABAT (98). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABAT’s over the last 12 months.
ABAT's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (100). This means that ABAT’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.
ABAT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (48). This means that ABAT’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.
GLCNF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as ABAT (100). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew similarly to ABAT’s over the last 12 months.
| ABAT | GLCNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
ABAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABAT and TWOSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABAT and TWOSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABAT | 100% | -2.66% | ||
| TWOSF - ABAT | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LAC - ABAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| NEXA - ABAT | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| FURY - ABAT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
| GLCNF - ABAT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
GLCNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLCNF has been closely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLCNF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLCNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLCNF | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| GLNCY - GLCNF | 89% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| BDNNY - GLCNF | 67% Closely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| FCX - GLCNF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LUNMF - GLCNF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| RIO - GLCNF | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||