Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABASX vs SSGSX
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ABASX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
ABASX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABASX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABASX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. ABASX (2.39B). ABASX (0.49) and SSGSX (0.47) have matching dividends . ABASX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ABASX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ABASX (1.09). ABASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than ABASX (4%) vs ABASX (4%). ABASX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. ABASX (-2.56). ABASX return over 5 years is better than : 35.78 vs. SSGSX (25.10).
| ABASX | SSGSX | ABASX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.809 | 2.046 | 186% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 5.64B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.47 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.56 | -0.11 | 2,245% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.70 | 0.11 | -647% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.78 | 25.10 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.84 | 25.48 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers