Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABALX vs MNBRX
ABALX vs MNBRX Comparison
Open Charts ABALX vs MNBRX
American Funds American Balanced A
Price$38.51
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.72M
ABALX vs MNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABALX vs. MNBRX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABALX is a Hold and MNBRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABALX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBRX (510M). ABALX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: ABALX (1.82) vs MNBRX (1.63). ABALX was incepted earlier than MNBRX: ABALX (50 years) vs MNBRX (15 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than ABALX (0.56). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. ABALX (44.00). ABALX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: ABALX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). ABALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.13 vs. MNBRX (0.93). ABALX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. MNBRX (1.12).
| ABALX | MNBRX | ABALX / MNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.27 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.27 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 50 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.169 | 6.221 | 212% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 510M | 51,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.63 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 0.93 | 872% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | 27.81 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.70 | 1.12 | 3,976% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.17 | 16.61 | 501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement