AB
Price
$39.88
Change
+$0.47 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.98B
38 days until earnings call
SEIC
Price
$82.99
Change
-$1.19 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AB vs SEIC

Header iconAB vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts AB vs SEICBanner chart's image
AllianceBernstein Holding
Price$39.88
Change+$0.47 (+1.19%)
Volume$138
Capitalization3.98B
SEI Investments
Price$82.99
Change-$1.19 (-1.41%)
Volume$649.6K
Capitalization9.3B
AB vs SEIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AB vs. SEIC commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AB is a StrongBuy and SEIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AB: $39.41 vs. SEIC: $82.99)
Brand notoriety: AB and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AB: 73% vs. SEIC: 64%
Market capitalization -- AB: $3.98B vs. SEIC: $9.3B
AB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.98B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than AB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than AB.

Price Growth

AB (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

AB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.55% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($9.3B) has a higher market cap than AB($3.98B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than AB: SEIC (20.47) vs AB (14.71). AB YTD gains are higher at: 11.487 vs. SEIC (1.197). SEIC has higher revenues than AB: SEIC (1.92B) vs AB (300M).
ABSEICAB / SEIC
Capitalization3.98B9.3B43%
EBITDAN/A669M-
Gain YTD11.4871.197959%
P/E Ratio14.7120.4772%
Revenue300M1.92B16%
Total CashN/A866M-
Total DebtN/A25.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AB vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
AB
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
10036
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AB's Valuation (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (78). This means that AB’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (36) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

AB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (48). This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AB (80). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBTL20.22-0.05
-0.22%
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF
SCYB26.11-0.07
-0.27%
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
TDSC23.97-0.19
-0.80%
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
FTEC185.51-3.01
-1.60%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
FMET31.87-0.82
-2.51%
Fidelity Metaverse ETF

AB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AB has been loosely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AB jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AB
1D Price
Change %
AB100%
-1.97%
JHG - AB
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
SEIC - AB
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
IVZ - AB
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
TROW - AB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
AMG - AB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-1.41%
TROW - SEIC
79%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BN - SEIC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
IVZ - SEIC
75%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
AMG - SEIC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
STT - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
More