AB
Price
$39.02
Change
+$0.18 (+0.46%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEIC
Price
$85.37
Change
-$0.75 (-0.87%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.45B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AB vs SEIC

Header iconAB vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts AB vs SEICBanner chart's image
AllianceBernstein Holding
Price$39.02
Change+$0.18 (+0.46%)
Volume$66.35K
Capitalization3.55B
SEI Investments
Price$85.37
Change-$0.75 (-0.87%)
Volume$280.41K
Capitalization10.45B
AB vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AB vs. SEIC commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AB is a Hold and SEIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AB: $39.02 vs. SEIC: $85.37)
Brand notoriety: AB and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AB: 34% vs. SEIC: 45%
Market capitalization -- AB: $3.55B vs. SEIC: $10.45B
AB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.55B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AB and SEIC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than AB.

Price Growth

AB (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AB is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($10.5B) has a higher market cap than AB($3.55B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than AB: SEIC (15.72) vs AB (12.92). AB YTD gains are higher at: 14.946 vs. SEIC (4.100). SEIC has higher revenues than AB: SEIC (2.25B) vs AB (360M).
ABSEICAB / SEIC
Capitalization3.55B10.5B34%
EBITDAN/A966M-
Gain YTD14.9464.100365%
P/E Ratio12.9215.7282%
Revenue360M2.25B16%
Total CashN/A824M-
Total DebtN/A26.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AB vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
AB
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
10033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2478
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AB's Valuation (8) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (82). This means that AB’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AB (54). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AB’s over the last 12 months.

AB's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (78). This means that AB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LKOR42.770.25
+0.58%
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
INCM28.270.10
+0.35%
Franklin Income Focus ETF
IJUL33.510.04
+0.12%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF July
LTTI19.22N/A
N/A
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
JABS50.13N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Secs ETF

AB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AB has been loosely correlated with AMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AB jumps, then AMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AB
1D Price
Change %
AB100%
+0.46%
AMG - AB
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
GAIN - AB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
TROW - AB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
SEIC - AB
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
JHG - AB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-0.87%
BN - SEIC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
TROW - SEIC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
JHG - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CG - SEIC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
KKR - SEIC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More