AAVMY
Price
$15.25
Change
+$0.07 (+0.46%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
SCBFY
Price
$24.67
Change
-$0.26 (-1.04%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

AAVMY vs SCBFY

Header iconAAVMY vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$15.25
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
Volume$80.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Standard Chartered
Price$24.67
Change-$0.26 (-1.04%)
Volume$158.16K
CapitalizationN/A
AAVMY vs SCBFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. SCBFY commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a Buy and SCBFY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $15.25 vs. SCBFY: $24.67)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 264% vs. SCBFY: 149%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $14.75B vs. SCBFY: $26.81B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $14.75B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than AAVMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($26.8B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($14.8B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than AAVMY: SCBFY (9.88) vs AAVMY (6.82). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 50.844 vs. AAVMY (16.508). AAVMY has less debt than SCBFY: AAVMY (65.2B) vs SCBFY (93.9B). SCBFY has higher revenues than AAVMY: SCBFY (17.1B) vs AAVMY (7.99B).
AAVMYSCBFYAAVMY / SCBFY
Capitalization14.8B26.8B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.50850.84432%
P/E Ratio6.829.8869%
Revenue7.99B17.1B47%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.2B93.9B69%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AAVMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
+0.46%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
HSBC - AAVMY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-1.04%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More