Advertisement
AAVMY vs BCLYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a StrongBuy and BCLYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AAVMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCLYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AAVMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BCLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while BCLYF (@Major Banks) price change was +6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+0.93% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| AAVMY | BCLYF | AAVMY / BCLYF | |
| Capitalization | 31.2B | 94.2B | 33% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.422 | 5.503 | 153% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.58 | 12.09 | 104% |
| Revenue | 8.66B | 28.5B | 30% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 84.7B | 122B | 69% |
AAVMY | BCLYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAVMY's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (67). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (11). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
BCLYF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (6). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.
BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (39). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.
AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (37). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
| AAVMY | BCLYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 57% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
AAVMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAVMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAVMY | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| ING - AAVMY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| SAN - AAVMY | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BCS - AAVMY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SCBFY - AAVMY | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| MUFG - AAVMY | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||
BCLYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCLYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCLYF | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| BCS - BCLYF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SAN - BCLYF | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.36% | ||
| ING - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| AAVMY - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| WFC - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||