AAVMY
Price
$34.33
Change
-$0.47 (-1.35%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
28.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BCLYF
Price
$5.80
Change
+$0.10 (+1.75%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
79.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs BCLYF

Header iconAAVMY vs BCLYF Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs BCLYFBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$34.33
Change-$0.47 (-1.35%)
Volume$11.83K
Capitalization28.26B
Barclays
Price$5.80
Change+$0.10 (+1.75%)
Volume$19.51K
Capitalization79.1B
AAVMY vs BCLYF Comparison Chart in %
AAVMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. BCLYF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a StrongBuy and BCLYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $33.89 vs. BCLYF: $5.70)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and BCLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 130% vs. BCLYF: 33%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $27.9B vs. BCLYF: $79.1B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $27.9B. BCLYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $79.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $840.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $140.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCLYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAVMY is a better buy in the long-term than BCLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCLYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the short-term than AAVMY.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while BCLYF (@Major Banks) price change was +7.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.27% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLYF($79.1B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($28.3B). AAVMY has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: AAVMY (11.57) vs BCLYF (10.61). AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 149.161 vs. BCLYF (72.205). BCLYF has higher revenues than AAVMY: BCLYF (27.8B) vs AAVMY (8.75B).
AAVMYBCLYFAAVMY / BCLYF
Capitalization28.3B79.1B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD149.16172.205207%
P/E Ratio11.5710.61109%
Revenue8.75B27.8B31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A117B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs BCLYF: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
BCLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
311
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
730
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
485

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAVMY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (62). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (11). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (6). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (41). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (30). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYBCLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAND.X0.1512000.009204
+6.48%
The Sandbox cryptocurrency
LRC.X0.0515000.002658
+5.44%
Loopring cryptocurrency
MEM36.660.17
+0.46%
Matthews Emerging Markets Eq Actv ETF
IBGK24.03-0.32
-1.30%
iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Trsy ETF
DENT.X0.000261-0.000011
-4.16%
Dent cryptocurrency

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
N/A
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
N/A
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More