AAVMY
Price
$37.85
Change
+$6.96 (+22.53%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
31.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ACGBY
Price
$17.10
Change
+$0.83 (+5.10%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
327.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAVMY vs ACGBY

Header iconAAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison
Open Charts AAVMY vs ACGBYBanner chart's image
Abn Amro BK N V
Price$37.85
Change+$6.96 (+22.53%)
Volume$16.71K
Capitalization31.16B
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$17.10
Change+$0.83 (+5.10%)
Volume$14.92K
Capitalization327.28B
AAVMY vs ACGBY Comparison Chart in %
AAVMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ACGBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAVMY vs. ACGBY commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAVMY is a StrongBuy and ACGBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AAVMY: $37.85 vs. ACGBY: $17.10)
Brand notoriety: AAVMY and ACGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAVMY: 155% vs. ACGBY: 58%
Market capitalization -- AAVMY: $31.16B vs. ACGBY: $327.28B
AAVMY [@Major Banks] is valued at $31.16B. ACGBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $327.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $848.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAVMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAVMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AAVMY and ACGBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAVMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAVMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AAVMY and ACGBY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AAVMY (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was -3.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.76% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($327B) has a higher market cap than AAVMY($31.2B). AAVMY has higher P/E ratio than ACGBY: AAVMY (12.58) vs ACGBY (6.09). AAVMY YTD gains are higher at: 8.422 vs. ACGBY (-7.392). ACGBY has higher revenues than AAVMY: ACGBY (721B) vs AAVMY (8.66B).
AAVMYACGBYAAVMY / ACGBY
Capitalization31.2B327B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.422-7.392-114%
P/E Ratio12.586.09206%
Revenue8.66B721B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt84.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAVMY vs ACGBY: Fundamental Ratings
AAVMY
ACGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBY's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (53). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (8). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AAVMY (6). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to AAVMY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (59). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

AAVMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (37). This means that AAVMY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAVMYACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAVMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ACGBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXU46.760.69
+1.50%
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX® ETF
PJIO62.42N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps ETF
MUB107.63-0.03
-0.03%
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
EMP20.76-0.14
-0.69%
Entergy Mississippi LLC
GQI57.47-0.40
-0.69%
Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF

AAVMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAVMY has been loosely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAVMY jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAVMY
1D Price
Change %
AAVMY100%
+1.77%
ING - AAVMY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
SAN - AAVMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-6.36%
BCS - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
SCBFY - AAVMY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
MUFG - AAVMY
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-1.44%
IDCBY - ACGBY
77%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
CICHY - ACGBY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
BACHY - ACGBY
69%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
AAVMY - ACGBY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More