AAUC
Price
$24.92
Change
+$0.46 (+1.88%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GRLGF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAUC vs GRLGF

Header iconAAUC vs GRLGF Comparison
Open Charts AAUC vs GRLGFBanner chart's image
Allied Gold
Price$24.92
Change+$0.46 (+1.88%)
Volume$169.98K
Capitalization3.03B
Greatland Gold
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$118.08K
Capitalization2.78B
AAUC vs GRLGF Comparison Chart in %
AAUC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAUC vs. GRLGF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAUC is a StrongBuy and GRLGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AAUC: $24.92 vs. GRLGF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: AAUC and GRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAUC: 27% vs. GRLGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AAUC: $3.03B vs. GRLGF: $2.78B
AAUC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.03B. GRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAUC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRLGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAUC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the long-term than AAUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRLGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the short-term than AAUC.

Price Growth

AAUC (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.04% price change this week, while GRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAUC($3.03B) has a higher market cap than GRLGF($2.78B). AAUC YTD gains are higher at: 974.138 vs. GRLGF (28.571). AAUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 241M vs. GRLGF (-10.79M). AAUC has more cash in the bank: 262M vs. GRLGF (71.9M). GRLGF has less debt than AAUC: GRLGF (7.74M) vs AAUC (139M). AAUC has higher revenues than GRLGF: AAUC (1.08B) vs GRLGF (8.29M).
AAUCGRLGFAAUC / GRLGF
Capitalization3.03B2.78B109%
EBITDA241M-10.79M-2,234%
Gain YTD974.13828.5713,409%
P/E RatioN/A419.31-
Revenue1.08B8.29M12,966%
Total Cash262M71.9M364%
Total Debt139M7.74M1,796%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAUCGRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAUC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X87301.43000066.687500
+0.08%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY690.31-0.07
-0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL273.40-0.41
-0.15%
Apple
GME21.09-0.44
-2.04%
GameStop Corp
TSLA475.19-10.21
-2.10%
Tesla

AAUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAUC has been loosely correlated with CMCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAUC jumps, then CMCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAUC
1D Price
Change %
AAUC100%
+1.88%
CMCL - AAUC
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
BTG - AAUC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
USAU - AAUC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
IAG - AAUC
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
WPM - AAUC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and EQTRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and EQTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
N/A
EQTRF - GRLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+15.83%
ODV - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
IAUX - GRLGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
NFGC - GRLGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
AAUC - GRLGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More