Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$20.42
Change+$0.24 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.87M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. AATSX (219M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FTHFX (0.70) vs AATSX (0.36). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). AATSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. AATSX (4.46). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. AATSX (47.01).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.63 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.63 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.879 | 10.502 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219M | 11.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 8.53 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.59 | 56.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.01 | 103.71 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.32 | 178.64 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement