Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FTHFX
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FTHFX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$19.63
Change+$0.16 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.66M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
AATSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. AATSX (206M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FTHFX (0.76) vs AATSX (0.38). AATSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: AATSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). AATSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs AATSX (1500000). AATSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.62 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. AATSX (53.85).
| AATSX | FTHFX | AATSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.63 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.63 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.822 | 3.280 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 1000000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 10.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.62 | 5.98 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.05 | 49.75 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.85 | 102.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.22 | 151.69 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement