Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AATSX vs FSSNX
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts AATSX vs FSSNX
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
Price$20.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.15M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
AATSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AATSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AATSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. AATSX (227M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than AATSX: FSSNX (1.03) vs AATSX (0.36). AATSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: AATSX (11 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). AATSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). AATSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.19 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than AATSX: FSSNX (0) vs AATSX (1500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. AATSX (0.17). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. AATSX (7.22).
| AATSX | FSSNX | AATSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.03 | 4,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.03 | 4,840% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.838 | 6.434 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 29.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.03 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | 18.62 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 39.32 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.22 | 25.49 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.61 | 169.89 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers