AASP
Price
$7.95
Change
+$0.48 (+6.43%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
961.88K
AMLTF
Price
$0.95
Change
+$0.14 (+17.28%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AASP vs AMLTF

Header iconAASP vs AMLTF Comparison
Open Charts AASP vs AMLTFBanner chart's image
Agassi Sports Entertainment
Price$7.95
Change+$0.48 (+6.43%)
Volume$125
Capitalization961.88K
AMP
Price$0.95
Change+$0.14 (+17.28%)
Volume$356
Capitalization2.66B
AASP vs AMLTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AASP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMLTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AASP vs. AMLTF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASP is a StrongBuy and AMLTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AASP: $7.95 vs. AMLTF: $0.95)
Brand notoriety: AASP and AMLTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AASP: 8% vs. AMLTF: 44%
Market capitalization -- AASP: $961.88K vs. AMLTF: $2.66B
AASP [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $961.88K. AMLTF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AASP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAMLTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AASP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AMLTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLTF is a better buy in the long-term than AASP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AASP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMLTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AASP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AMLTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AASP is a better buy in the short-term than AMLTF.

Price Growth

AASP (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while AMLTF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMLTF($2.66B) has a higher market cap than AASP($962K). AASP YTD gains are higher at: 189.091 vs. AMLTF (1.315). AMLTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.92B vs. AASP (-51.65K). AMLTF has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. AASP (45.6K). AASP has less debt than AMLTF: AASP (3.3M) vs AMLTF (28.7B). AMLTF has higher revenues than AASP: AMLTF (856M) vs AASP (0).
AASPAMLTFAASP / AMLTF
Capitalization962K2.66B0%
EBITDA-51.65K1.92B-0%
Gain YTD189.0911.31514,382%
P/E RatioN/A21.46-
Revenue0856M-
Total Cash45.6K7.18B0%
Total Debt3.3M28.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AASP vs AMLTF: Fundamental Ratings
AASP
AMLTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
982
SMR RATING
1..100
10019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMLTF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AASP (84). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AASP’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMLTF (82). This means that AASP’s stock grew significantly faster than AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AASP (100). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew significantly faster than AASP’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLTF (46). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

AASP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLTF (100). This means that AASP’s stock grew similarly to AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AASPAMLTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AASP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMLTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TUSK2.720.05
+1.87%
Mammoth Energy Services
ZS284.30N/A
N/A
Zscaler
MOGU2.24N/A
-0.18%
MOGU
SFBS81.24-0.56
-0.68%
ServisFirst Bancshares
SNDX9.63-0.36
-3.60%
Syndax Pharmaceuticals

AMLTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLTF and AVNI have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLTF and AVNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLTF
1D Price
Change %
AMLTF100%
N/A
AVNI - AMLTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AASP - AMLTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQST - AMLTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABVN - AMLTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More