Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMDX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
Price$28.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.09B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. AASCX (3.09B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMDX (1.24) vs AASCX (0.38). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). AASCX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMDX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. AASCX (-8.62). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. AASCX (0.03).
| AASCX | FSMDX | AASCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,840% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,840% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.917 | 11.433 | -60% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 45.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.24 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.62 | 9.46 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.98 | 48.92 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.03 | 46.87 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.76 | 151.06 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement