Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AASCX vs FSMAX
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMAX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
Price$28.55
Change-$2.67 (-8.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.98B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
AASCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. AASCX (2.98B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs AASCX (0.35). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AASCX (33 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AASCX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMAX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. AASCX (-8.01). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. AASCX (-2.73).
| AASCX | FSMAX | AASCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.04 | 2,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.04 | 2,743% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.292 | 3.050 | 108% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 40.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.01 | 10.51 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.27 | 48.06 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | 19.23 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.67 | 157.02 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers