AANNF
Price
$3.57
Change
-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.36B
SVAUF
Price
$3.46
Change
+$0.02 (+0.58%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AANNF vs SVAUF

Header iconAANNF vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts AANNF vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
Aroundtown SA
Price$3.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Volume$400
Capitalization4.36B
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.58%)
Volume$10.7K
Capitalization1.27B
AANNF vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AANNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AANNF vs. SVAUF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AANNF is a Hold and SVAUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (AANNF: $3.57 vs. SVAUF: $3.45)
Brand notoriety: AANNF and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AANNF: 1% vs. SVAUF: 58%
Market capitalization -- AANNF: $4.36B vs. SVAUF: $1.27B
AANNF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.36B. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AANNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AANNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AANNF and SVAUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AANNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AANNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AANNF and SVAUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AANNF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AANNF($4.36B) has a higher market cap than SVAUF($1.27B). SVAUF YTD gains are higher at: 26.095 vs. AANNF (6.567). AANNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 915M vs. SVAUF (168M). AANNF has more cash in the bank: 3.35B vs. SVAUF (21.5M). SVAUF has less debt than AANNF: SVAUF (2.18B) vs AANNF (13.9B). AANNF has higher revenues than SVAUF: AANNF (1.18B) vs SVAUF (319M).
AANNFSVAUFAANNF / SVAUF
Capitalization4.36B1.27B343%
EBITDA915M168M545%
Gain YTD6.56726.09525%
P/E Ratio14.51N/A-
Revenue1.18B319M371%
Total Cash3.35B21.5M15,567%
Total Debt13.9B2.18B639%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AANNFSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AANNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBIZ33.390.15
+0.44%
Global X E-commerce ETF
UNIY48.99N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Voya Yld Enh USD Unvsl Bd Fd
GGRW34.43-0.01
-0.02%
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
JFLI49.98-0.05
-0.10%
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
DBL15.31-0.05
-0.33%
Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund

AANNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AANNF and SVAUF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AANNF and SVAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AANNF
1D Price
Change %
AANNF100%
N/A
SVAUF - AANNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VONOY - AANNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BEKE - AANNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
ABCP - AANNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADPPF - AANNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVAUF and VONOY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVAUF and VONOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVAUF
1D Price
Change %
SVAUF100%
N/A
VONOY - SVAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
AANNF - SVAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOUS - SVAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
DTCWY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
FRPH - SVAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More