AAMMF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.02 (-8.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.11M
OICT
Price
$10.53
Change
+$0.42 (+4.15%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAMMF vs OICT

Header iconAAMMF vs OICT Comparison
Open Charts AAMMF vs OICTBanner chart's image
Almadex Minerals
Price$0.23
Change-$0.02 (-8.00%)
Volume$240
Capitalization13.11M
Oicintra
Price$10.53
Change+$0.42 (+4.15%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
AAMMF vs OICT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMMF vs. OICT commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMMF is a Buy and OICT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AAMMF: $0.23 vs. OICT: $10.53)
Brand notoriety: AAMMF and OICT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMMF: 1% vs. OICT: 69%
Market capitalization -- AAMMF: $13.11M vs. OICT: $0
AAMMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.11M. OICT’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOICT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OICT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AAMMF and OICT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAMMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OICT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAMMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OICT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OICT is a better buy in the short-term than AAMMF.

Price Growth

AAMMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while OICT (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OICT YTD gains are higher at: 99.386 vs. AAMMF (94.500).
AAMMFOICTAAMMF / OICT
Capitalization13.1MN/A-
EBITDA1.44MN/A-
Gain YTD94.50099.38695%
P/E Ratio5.37N/A-
Revenue5.56MN/A-
Total Cash19.5MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMMF vs OICT: Fundamental Ratings
AAMMF
OICT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
76100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OICT's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAMMF (79). This means that OICT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAMMF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to OICT’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to OICT’s over the last 12 months.

OICT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as AAMMF (39). This means that OICT’s stock grew similarly to AAMMF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew significantly faster than OICT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMMFOICT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QD3.090.24
+8.42%
Qudian
AIMD0.500.02
+3.69%
Ainos
RPRX35.890.62
+1.76%
Royalty Pharma plc
STRA85.89-0.24
-0.28%
Strategic Education
MPU0.80-0.16
-17.05%
Mega Matrix Inc

AAMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMMF and FNMCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMMF and FNMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMMF
1D Price
Change %
AAMMF100%
N/A
FNMCF - AAMMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
OICT - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
AIRRF - AAMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
AISSF - AAMMF
0%
Poorly correlated
+87.50%
AGXKF - AAMMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OICT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OICT has been loosely correlated with BOCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OICT jumps, then BOCOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OICT
1D Price
Change %
OICT100%
+4.13%
BOCOF - OICT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AAMMF - OICT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDIV - OICT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - OICT
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
ORFDF - OICT
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.34%
More