AAMMF
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.04 (+10.81%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
24.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ABMBF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
89.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAMMF vs ABMBF

Header iconAAMMF vs ABMBF Comparison
Open Charts AAMMF vs ABMBFBanner chart's image
Almadex Minerals
Price$0.41
Change+$0.04 (+10.81%)
Volume$19.07K
Capitalization24.14M
Abcourt Mines
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$288.51K
Capitalization89.58M
AAMMF vs ABMBF Comparison Chart in %
AAMMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ABMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMMF vs. ABMBF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMMF is a StrongBuy and ABMBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AAMMF: $0.41 vs. ABMBF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: AAMMF and ABMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMMF: 46% vs. ABMBF: 67%
Market capitalization -- AAMMF: $24.14M vs. ABMBF: $89.58M
AAMMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.14M. ABMBF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $89.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileABMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ABMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAMMF is a better buy in the long-term than ABMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAMMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ABMBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAMMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ABMBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAMMF is a better buy in the short-term than ABMBF.

Price Growth

AAMMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +17.14% price change this week, while ABMBF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABMBF($89.6M) has a higher market cap than AAMMF($24.1M). AAMMF YTD gains are higher at: 241.667 vs. ABMBF (143.451). AAMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.2M vs. ABMBF (-20.52M). AAMMF has more cash in the bank: 19.9M vs. ABMBF (594K). AAMMF has higher revenues than ABMBF: AAMMF (179K) vs ABMBF (0).
AAMMFABMBFAAMMF / ABMBF
Capitalization24.1M89.6M27%
EBITDA-2.2M-20.52M11%
Gain YTD241.667143.451168%
P/E Ratio56.12N/A-
Revenue179K0-
Total Cash19.9M594K3,350%
Total DebtN/A16M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMMF vs ABMBF: Fundamental Ratings
AAMMF
ABMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
84100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAMMF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (97). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABMBF (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (36). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ABMBF (23). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to ABMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMMFABMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAMMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ABMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIBH44.00N/A
N/A
First Bancshares, Inc.
AFBOF10.10N/A
N/A
African Rainbow Minerals Ltd.
SSILF0.12N/A
N/A
Sa Sa International Holdings Ltd.
SNTMF0.27N/A
N/A
SENSETIME GROUP INC.
SBNYL5.20N/A
N/A
Signature Bank (New York, NY)

AAMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMMF and PMNXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMMF and PMNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMMF
1D Price
Change %
AAMMF100%
+10.81%
PMNXF - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRRF - AAMMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
AGXKF - AAMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABMBF - AAMMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ABNAF - AAMMF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ABMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABMBF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABMBF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABMBF
1D Price
Change %
ABMBF100%
-0.40%
HWAUF - ABMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
ALKEF - ABMBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
AGXKF - ABMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISSF - ABMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
AIRRF - ABMBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More