AAME
Price
$1.83
Change
-$0.01 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
57.13M
PRU
Price
$102.97
Change
-$1.93 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
42.17B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAME vs PRU

Header iconAAME vs PRU Comparison
Open Charts AAME vs PRUBanner chart's image
Atlantic American
Price$1.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.54%)
Volume$7.52K
Capitalization57.13M
Prudential Financial
Price$102.97
Change-$1.93 (-1.84%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization42.17B
AAME vs PRU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAME vs. PRU commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAME is a StrongBuy and PRU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AAME: $1.83 vs. PRU: $102.97)
Brand notoriety: AAME: Not notable vs. PRU: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAME: 60% vs. PRU: 77%
Market capitalization -- AAME: $57.13M vs. PRU: $42.17B
AAME [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $57.13M. PRU’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $42.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAME’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAME’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAME is a better buy in the long-term than PRU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AAME (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +6.40% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRU is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.92% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRU($42.2B) has a higher market cap than AAME($57.1M). AAME has higher P/E ratio than PRU: AAME (20.00) vs PRU (17.25). AAME YTD gains are higher at: 20.673 vs. PRU (-10.950). PRU has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. AAME (24.3M). AAME has less debt than PRU: AAME (36.8M) vs PRU (20.9B). PRU has higher revenues than AAME: PRU (54.3B) vs AAME (185M).
AAMEPRUAAME / PRU
Capitalization57.1M42.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.673-10.950-189%
P/E Ratio20.0017.25116%
Revenue185M54.3B0%
Total Cash24.3M341B0%
Total Debt36.8M20.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAME vs PRU: Fundamental Ratings
AAME
PRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9622
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRU's Valuation (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AAME (43) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to AAME’s over the last 12 months.

PRU's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAME (96) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew significantly faster than AAME’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's SMR Rating (91) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (71) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ULST40.55N/A
N/A
SPDR® SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
UJAN39.60-0.22
-0.54%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan
TDIV86.02-0.93
-1.07%
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF
SWZ6.26-0.11
-1.73%
Total Return Securities Inc
MSTZ4.74-0.09
-1.86%
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF

AAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAME and PKIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAME and PKIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAME
1D Price
Change %
AAME100%
-0.54%
PKIN - AAME
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MET - AAME
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
PRU - AAME
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
AFL - AAME
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
MFC - AAME
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
More