AAME
Price
$2.34
Change
-$0.02 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
57.13M
AFL
Price
$104.57
Change
+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.4B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAME vs AFL

Header iconAAME vs AFL Comparison
Open Charts AAME vs AFLBanner chart's image
Atlantic American
Price$2.34
Change-$0.02 (-0.85%)
Volume$31.47K
Capitalization57.13M
Aflac
Price$104.57
Change+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Volume$994.9K
Capitalization49.4B
AAME vs AFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAME vs. AFL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAME is a Hold and AFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AAME: $2.34 vs. AFL: $104.57)
Brand notoriety: AAME and AFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAME: 200% vs. AFL: 46%
Market capitalization -- AAME: $57.13M vs. AFL: $49.4B
AAME [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $57.13M. AFL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $49.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAME’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAME’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than AAME.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAME’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAME’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than AAME.

Price Growth

AAME (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +15.27% price change this week, while AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($49.4B) has a higher market cap than AAME($57.1M). AAME has higher P/E ratio than AFL: AAME (20.00) vs AFL (10.95). AAME YTD gains are higher at: 54.304 vs. AFL (2.219). AFL has more cash in the bank: 77.6B vs. AAME (24.3M). AAME has less debt than AFL: AAME (36.8M) vs AFL (7.36B). AFL has higher revenues than AAME: AFL (18.8B) vs AAME (185M).
AAMEAFLAAME / AFL
Capitalization57.1M49.4B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD54.3042.2192,447%
P/E Ratio20.0010.95183%
Revenue185M18.8B1%
Total Cash24.3M77.6B0%
Total Debt36.8M7.36B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAME vs AFL: Fundamental Ratings
AAME
AFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
873
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5114
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAME's Valuation (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (70) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAME (87) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AFL’s stock grew significantly faster than AAME’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's SMR Rating (91) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AAME's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (39) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AAME’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAME (51) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMEAFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCO6.520.04
+0.62%
abrdn Global Income Fund
RSPH29.230.05
+0.15%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
RMOP24.49-0.03
-0.13%
Rockefeller Opportunistic Muncpl Bd ETF
BKGI38.54-0.21
-0.54%
BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF
GLDM66.04-0.43
-0.65%
SPDR® Gold MiniShares

AAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAME and PKIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAME and PKIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAME
1D Price
Change %
AAME100%
-0.85%
PKIN - AAME
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MET - AAME
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
PRU - AAME
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
AFL - AAME
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
MFC - AAME
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with GL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then GL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
+1.01%
GL - AFL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PRI - AFL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
MET - AFL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
PRU - AFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
UNM - AFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More