Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAMCX vs ACRIX
AAMCX vs ACRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMCX vs. ACRIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMCX is a Buy and ACRIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. AAMCX (57.4M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than AAMCX: ACRIX (0.52) vs AAMCX (0.00). AAMCX was incepted earlier than ACRIX: AAMCX (10 years) vs ACRIX (9 years). AAMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). AAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). AAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: AAMCX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). AAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. ACRIX (1.48). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. AAMCX (16.89).
| AAMCX | ACRIX | AAMCX / ACRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.18 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.18 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | 7.386 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.4M | 1.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 1.48 | 499% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.32 | 25.50 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.89 | 38.72 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement