Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALGX vs RWIBX
AALGX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts AALGX vs RWIBX
Thrivent Global Stock A
Price$29.61
Change-$1.44 (-4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2
Price$73.65
Change-$1.17 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.37B
AALGX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALGX vs. RWIBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALGX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. AALGX (2.4B). AALGX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: AALGX (1.24) vs RWIBX (0.82). AALGX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: AALGX (39 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than AALGX (0.96). AALGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWIBX (27.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AALGX: RWIBX (250) vs AALGX (2000). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. AALGX (10.12). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.57 vs. AALGX (12.02).
| AALGX | RWIBX | AALGX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.51 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.51 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.063 | 4.855 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 142B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.82 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 15.23 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.40 | 39.74 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.02 | 26.57 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.65 | 93.35 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement