Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AALGX vs CWGCX
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts AALGX vs CWGCX
Thrivent Global Stock A
Price$29.61
Change-$1.44 (-4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc C
Price$73.92
Change-$1.14 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.37B
AALGX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AALGX vs. CWGCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AALGX is a Hold and CWGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. AALGX (2.4B). AALGX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: AALGX (1.24) vs CWGCX (0.84). AALGX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: AALGX (39 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). CWGCX (1.49) is less costly to investors than AALGX (0.96). AALGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CWGCX (27.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AALGX: CWGCX (250) vs AALGX (2000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. AALGX (10.12). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.77 vs. AALGX (12.02).
| AALGX | CWGCX | AALGX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.49 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.49 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.063 | 4.866 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 142B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.84 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 15.29 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.40 | 39.90 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.02 | 26.77 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.65 | 93.96 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement