Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAHYX vs PZRMX
AAHYX vs PZRMX Comparison
Open Charts AAHYX vs PZRMX
Thrivent Conservative Allocation A
Price$7.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets976.02M
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst A
Price$8.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
AAHYX vs PZRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAHYX vs. PZRMX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAHYX is a Hold and PZRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZRMX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. AAHYX (976M). AAHYX pays higher dividends than PZRMX: AAHYX (3.80) vs PZRMX (2.98). AAHYX was incepted earlier than PZRMX: AAHYX (29 years) vs PZRMX (14 years). PZRMX (2.62) is less costly to investors than AAHYX (0.95). PZRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 219.00 vs. AAHYX (50.00). PZRMX initial investment is less costly to investors than AAHYX (5%) vs AAHYX (5%). PZRMX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAHYX: PZRMX (1000) vs AAHYX (2000). PZRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. AAHYX (7.50). PZRMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.66 vs. AAHYX (19.16).
| AAHYX | PZRMX | AAHYX / PZRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.40 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.62 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.213 | 7.588 | 56% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 1.84B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 2.98 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 9.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.89 | 18.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.16 | 41.66 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.15 | 61.62 | 60% |