Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAHYX vs PFIPX
AAHYX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts AAHYX vs PFIPX
Thrivent Conservative Allocation A
Price$14.91
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.80
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
AAHYX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAHYX vs. PFIPX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAHYX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. AAHYX (1.01B). AAHYX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: AAHYX (3.70) vs PFIPX (2.49). AAHYX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: AAHYX (29 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than AAHYX (0.95). AAHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAHYX: PFIPX (0) vs AAHYX (2000). AAHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. PFIPX (6.97). AAHYX return over 5 years is better than : 15.07 vs. PFIPX (10.32).
| AAHYX | PFIPX | AAHYX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.245 | 9.119 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 2.23B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.70 | 2.49 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 6.97 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.90 | 23.64 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.07 | 10.32 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.95 | 34.80 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement