AAGFF
Price
$0.71
Change
+$0.01 (+1.43%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
224.63M
GLNCY
Price
$8.97
Change
+$0.11 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
52.85B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAGFF vs GLNCY

Header iconAAGFF vs GLNCY Comparison
Open Charts AAGFF vs GLNCYBanner chart's image
Aftermath Silver
Price$0.71
Change+$0.01 (+1.43%)
Volume$1.07M
Capitalization224.63M
Glencore
Price$8.97
Change+$0.11 (+1.24%)
Volume$549.92K
Capitalization52.85B
AAGFF vs GLNCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAGFF vs. GLNCY commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAGFF is a StrongBuy and GLNCY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AAGFF: $0.71 vs. GLNCY: $8.97)
Brand notoriety: AAGFF and GLNCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAGFF: 179% vs. GLNCY: 89%
Market capitalization -- AAGFF: $224.63M vs. GLNCY: $52.85B
AAGFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $224.63M. GLNCY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $52.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAGFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the long-term than AAGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAGFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNCY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAGFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the short-term than AAGFF.

Price Growth

AAGFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNCY($52.9B) has a higher market cap than AAGFF($225M). AAGFF YTD gains are higher at: 142.169 vs. GLNCY (5.658). GLNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. AAGFF (-8.89M). GLNCY has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. AAGFF (19.6M). GLNCY has higher revenues than AAGFF: GLNCY (231B) vs AAGFF (0).
AAGFFGLNCYAAGFF / GLNCY
Capitalization225M52.9B0%
EBITDA-8.89M8.13B-0%
Gain YTD142.1695.6582,513%
P/E RatioN/A14.59-
Revenue0231B-
Total Cash19.6M2.68B1%
Total DebtN/A41.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAGFF vs GLNCY: Fundamental Ratings
AAGFF
GLNCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9553
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AAGFF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNCY (94). This means that AAGFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAGFF (95). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAGFF’s over the last 12 months.

AAGFF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (100). This means that AAGFF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

AAGFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (46). This means that AAGFF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAGFF (100). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAGFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAGFFGLNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAT16.900.24
+1.44%
Mattel
OPK1.450.02
+1.40%
OPKO Health
MFG6.850.07
+1.03%
Mizuho Financial Group
FDBC44.370.08
+0.18%
Fidelity D & D Bancorp
BMGL1.76-0.02
-1.12%
Basel Medical Group Ltd

AAGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAGFF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAGFF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAGFF
1D Price
Change %
AAGFF100%
+2.45%
AGXPF - AAGFF
55%
Loosely correlated
-8.68%
GRSLF - AAGFF
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
GLNCY - AAGFF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
IVPAF - AAGFF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
AZMCF - AAGFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
More

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with GLCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then GLCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
+1.24%
GLCNF - GLNCY
89%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
BDNNY - GLNCY
72%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
IVPAF - GLNCY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More